Dialogic Interactivity in the use of a smart whiteboard
Keywords:
interactive whiteboard, dialogic teaching, interactivity, language learningAbstract
The aim of this paper work is to analyze the practices of an English language teacher, from the tertiary sector in a city in the state of Sao Paulo, in an attempt to develop dialogic tea IWB (Interactive Whiteboard) and the internet. It was observed that in the teacher-learner-IWB interaction, the instrumentalist view of interactivity, which implies physical interaction with the use ofa mouse for instance, not necessarily impacts decisions made with respect to the direction and paths taken in class, these decisions are based on dialogue and interaction processes that occur, anchored by the IWB. These processes of dialogic interactivity seem to give voice to learners towards a teaching paradigm in which students come to play an active role in the process of teaching and learning.
Downloads
References
ALDRICH, F.; ROGERS, Y.; SCAIFE, M. Getting to grips with “interactivity”: helping teachers assess the educational value of CD-ROMs. British Journal of Educational Technology, v. 29, n. 4, p. 11, 1998.
ALEXANDER, R. Culture, dialogue and learning: Notes on an emerging pedagogy. Exploring talk in school, p. 91-114, 2008.
ALEXANDER, R. J. Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. Dialogos Cambridge, 2006. ISBN 0954694333.
BAKHTIN, M. The dialogic imagination, trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981. v. 69.
BEAUCHAMP, G.; KENNEWELL, S. Interactivity in the classroom and its impact on learning. Computers & Education, v. 54, n. 3, p. 759-766, 2010.
BETCHER, C.; LEE, M. The Interactive Whiteboard Revolution. teaching with IWBs. REDMAN, R. Victoria, Australia: ACER Press, 2009.
BOHN, H. I. Ensino e aprendizagem de línguas: os atores da sala de aula e a necessidade de rupturas. In: MOITA LOPES, L. P. (Ed.). Linguística Aplicada na Modernidade Recente: festschrift para Antonieta Celani. São Paulo: Parábola, 2013. v. 1, cap. 3, p. 79-98. ISBN 978-85-7934-074-1.
CAJAL, I. B. A interação de sala de aula: como o professor reage às falas iniciadas pelos alunos. In: COX, M. I. P.; ASSIS-PETERSON, A. A. (Ed.). Cenas de sala de aula. Campinas: Mercado de Letras, 2001. cap. 5, p. 125-159.
HENNESSY, S. The role of digital artefacts on the interactive whiteboard in supporting classroom dialogue. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, v. 27, n. 6, p. 463-489, 2011.
MERCER, N. et al. Can the interactive whiteboard help to provide ‘dialogic space’ for children’s collaborative activity? Language and Education, v. 24, n. 5, p. 367-384, // 2010.
MOSS, G. et al. The interactive whiteboard, pedagogy and pupil performance evaluation: an Evaluation of the Schools Whiteboard Expansion (SWE) Project: London Challenge. London College. Department for Education and Skills/Institute of Education. 2007
NAKASHIMA, R. H. R.; AMARAL, S. F. D. Indicadores didático-pedagógicos da lousa interativa. Caderno de Educação, v. 37, p. 34, 2010.
OLIVER, R. Interactions in multimedia learning materials: the things that matter. In: MCBEATH, C.; ATKINSON, R., Third International Interactive Multimedia Symposium, 1996.
ROJO, R.; MOURA, E. (Org.) Multiletramentos na escola. São Paulo: Parábola, 2012.
SIGNORINI, I. Letramento e inovação no ensino e na formação do professor de Língua Portuguesa. In: SIGNORINI, I. (Org.) Signifi cados da inovação no ensino de Língua Portuguesa e na formação de professores.Campinas: Mercado de Letras, 2007, pp. 211-228.
SØBY, M. Digital competence – from education policy to pedagogy: the Norwegian context. In: LANKSHEAR, C.; KNOBEL, M. Digital Literacies. New York: Peter Lank, 2008. p. 119-150.
WAGNER, E. D. In support of a functional defi nition of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, v. 8, n. 2, p. 20, 1994.
WEGERIF, R.; YANG, Y. Technology and dialogic space: lessons from history and from the ‘Argunaut’and ‘Metafora’projects. Long papers, p. 312, 2011.
XU, H. L.; MOLONEY, R. Perceptions of interactive whiteboard pedagogy in the teaching of Chinese language. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, v. 27, n. 2, p. 307-325, 2011.
