Left-dislocation of indefinites in Brazilian Portuguese: topic or focus in the information structure?
Keywords:
left-dislocation, focus, topic, indefinites nominal phrases, conversational implicaturesAbstract
This work investigates the semantic and pragmatic inferences in Brazilian Portuguese (BP) contexts in which indefinites nominal phrases are dislocated to left periphery of sentence. More precisely, this approach attempts to answer three questions: (i) what are the functions of the information structure (topic or focus) that indefinite phrases conform to when left-dislocation takes place? (ii) In BP, is it possible for indefinite nominal phrases to be topics? (iii) Why does the speaker prefer to say a sentence with a left-dislocated indefinite element? Which implicatures are at stake?
Downloads
References
BÜRING, D. Topic. In: BOSCH, P.; VAN DER SANDT, R. (Ed.). Focus: linguistic, cognitive, and computation perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. p. 142-165.
BÜRING, D. On D-trees, beans, and B-accents. Linguistics & Philosophy, v. 26, n. 5, p. 511-545, 2003.
CHOMSKY, N. Deep Structure, Surface structure and semantic interpretation. In: STEINBERG, D.; JAKOBOVITS, L. (Ed.) Semantics: an interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971. p. 183-216.
HAMBLIN, C. Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language, n. 10, p. 41-53, 1973.
HEIM, I. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Ph. D. thesis. University of Massachusetts at Amherst, 1982.
GRICE, H. P. Logic and conversation. In: COLE, P.; MORGAN, J. (Ed.) Syntax and Semantics, v. 3. New York: Academic Press, 1975. p. 41-58.
ROBERTS, C. Information Structure in Discourse: Towards an Integrated Formal Theory of Pragmatics. In: YOON, J. H.; KATHOL, A. (Ed.) OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 49: papers in semantics. The Ohio State University Department of Linguistics? 1996. p. 91-136.
ROOTH, M. Focus. In: LAPPIN, S. (Ed.) Handbook of contemporary semantic theory. London: Blackwell, 1995. p. 271-298.