Rhetorical relations and types of arguments: a study of the possible correlations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21165/el.v47i2.1935

Keywords:

RST, New Rhetoric, rhetorical relations, argumentation

Abstract

This paper aims at presenting the types of arguments used in argumentative texts and the rhetorical relations emerging from such arguments, as well as the possible correlations between the rhetorical relations and the types of arguments. The corpus of the research is composed of 100 essays of the argumentative response genre produced for the 2013 summer entrance exams of Universidade Estadual de Maringá. The typology of the arguments used in the analysis is based on the New Rhetorics, as proposed by Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca (2005), and the taxonomy of the rhetorical relations is based on Mann and Thompson (1988). The results show recurrent correlations between argument types and rhetorical relations. This demonstrates the possibility of mapping discursive-argumentative relations in the relational propositions that emerge from the textual portions of the analyzed genre.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Juliano Desiderato Antonio, UEM

Docente no departamento de Letras da Universidade Estadual de Maringá.

Tem experiência na área de Linguística, com ênfase em Funcionalismo, atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: Funcionalismo, Ensino de gramática e Estrutura Retórica do Texto.

É coordenador do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras.

Virginia Maria Nuss, Unesp - São José do Rio Preto

Doutoranda no PPGEL da UNESP - câmpus São José do Rio Preto

References

ANTONIO, J. D. Detecting central units in argumentative answer genre: signals that

influence annotator’s agreement. Actas del XXXI Congreso de la Sociedad Española para

el Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural. Anais... Alicante (Espanha): Sociedad Española

para el Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 2015.

AZAR, M. Argumentative Text as Rhetorical Structure: An Application of Rhetorical

Structure Theory. Argumentation, v. 13, p. 97-114, 1999.

CARLSON, L.; MARCU, D. Discourse Tagging Reference Manual. Los Angeles:

University of Southern California, 2001.

FIORIN, J. L. Argumentação. São Paulo: Contexto, 2015.

MANN, W. C.; THOMPSON, S. A. Relational propositions in discourse. Los Angeles:

Information Sciences Institute, 1983.

MANN, W. C.; THOMPSON, S. A. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization.

Text, v. 8, n. 3, p. 243-281, 1988.

MANN, W. C.; THOMPSON, S. A. The Structure of Discourse and ‘subordination’. In: HAIMAN, J.; THOMPSON,

S. (Ed.). Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: J.

Benjamins, 1988. p. 275-329.

MENEGASSI, R. J. A escrita na formação docente inicial: influências da iniciação à

pesquisa. Signum: Estudos da Linguagem, v. 14, n. 1, p. 387-419, 2011.

PERELMAN, C.; OLBRECHTS-TYTECA, L. Tratado de argumentação: nova retórica. Tradução de Maria Ermantina de Almeida Prado Galvão. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2005.

Published

2018-10-17

How to Cite

Antonio, J. D., & Nuss, V. M. (2018). Rhetorical relations and types of arguments: a study of the possible correlations. Estudos Linguísticos (São Paulo. 1978), 47(2), 519–531. https://doi.org/10.21165/el.v47i2.1935

Issue

Section

Funcionalismo