O orientador como mediador de letramento privilegiado no processo de escrita da tese de doutorandos
The supervisor as a privileged literacy broker in the doctoral thesis writing process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21165/gel.v19i1.3360Keywords:
Doctoral students, Academic writing, Academic literacies, Literacy brokers, SupervisorAbstract
This article aims is to analyze how the relationships of four doctoral students of different areas of knowledge at UNICAMP with their respective supervisors are developed during the thesis writing process. To this end, this work is based on the theoretical-methodological principles of Academic Literacies and ethnography of language. In this research, supervisors are considered privileged literacy brokers. The data show the nature of the power relations in the interactions between doctoral students and their supervisors, in addition to the incompatibility between the expectations created by the participants and the reality of the relationship between students and supervisors. This article, therefore, points to the need to implement institutional policies that promote training for supervisors based on the Academic Literacies perspective.
Downloads
References
BADENHORST, C.; GUERIN, C. Post/Graduate research literacies and writing pedagogies. In: BADENHORST, C.; GUERIN, C. (org.). Research literacies and writing pedagogies for masters and doctoral writers. Leiden: Brill, 2016. p. 3-28.
BARTON, D.; HAMILTON, M. Local literacies: reading and writing in one community. Londres: Routledge, 1998.
BITCHENER, J.; BASTURKMEN, H.; EAST, M. The focus of supervisor written feedback to thesis/dissertation students. International Journal of English Studies, v. 10, n. 2, p. 79-97, 2010. Disponível em: https://revistas.um.es/ijes/article/view/119201. Acesso em: 05 out. 2021.
BLOMMAERT, J. Ethnography as counter-hegemony: remarks on epistemology and method. Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies (Paper 34), London: Institute of Education, 2006.
CAN, G.; WALKER, A. A model for doctoral students’ perceptions and attitudes toward written feedback for academic writing. Research in Higher Education, v. 52, n. 5, p. 508-536, 2011. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11162-010-9204-1. Acesso em: 05 out. 2021.
CORNÉR, S.; LÖFSTRÖM, E.; PYHÄLTÖ, K. The relationships between doctoral students’ perceptions of supervision and burnout. International Journal of Doctoral Studies,
v. 12, s/n, p. 91-106, 2017. Disponível em: http://informingscience.com/ijds/Volume12/IJDSv12p091-106Corner2809.pdf. Acesso em: 05 out. 2021.
GARCEZ, P. M.; SCHULZ, L. Olhares circunstanciados: etnografia da linguagem e pesquisa em Linguística Aplicada no Brasil. D.E.L.T.A, v. 31, n. especial, p. 01-34, 2015. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/delta/a/JFbNhQBtw53N4C8j3Q36Lvg/abstract/?lang=pt. Acesso em: 05 out. 2021.
HODZA, F. Managing the student-supervisor relationship for successful post-graduate supervision: a sociological perspective. South African Journal of Higher Education, v. 21, n. 8, p. 1155-1165, 2007. Disponível em: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/sajhe/article/view/25767. Acesso em: 05 out. 2021.
IVANIČ, R. Writing and identity: the discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1998.
JUNG, N. M.; MACHADO E SILVA, R. C.; PIRES SANTOS, M. E. Etnografia da linguagem como políticas em ação. Calidoscópio, v. 17, n. 1, p. 145-162, 2019. Disponível em: http://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2019.171.08. Acesso em: 05 out. 2021.
KNOWLES, S. S. Underground murmurs: disturbing supervisory practices of feedback. In: BADENHORST, C.; GUERIN, C. (org.). Research literacies and writing pedagogies for masters and doctoral writers. Leiden: Brill, 2016. p. 295-313.
LEA, M. R. Academic literacies in theory and practice. In: STREET, B. V.; MAY, S. (org.). Encyclopedia of Language and Education: Literacies and Language Education. 3. ed. New York: Springer, 2017. p. 147-158.
LEA, M. R.; STREET, B. V. O modelo de “letramentos acadêmicos”: teoria e aplicações. Tradução Fabiana Komesu e Adriana Fischer. Filologia e Linguística Portuguesa, v. 16,
n. 2, p. 477-493, 2014. Disponível em: https://www.revistas.usp.br/flp/article/view/79407. Acesso em: 05 out. 2021.
LEA, M. R.; STREET, B. V. Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, v. 23, n. 2, p. 157-171, 1998. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03075079812331380364. Acesso em: 05 out. 2021.
LILLIS, T. Bringing writers’ voices to writing research: talk around texts. In: CARTER, A.; LILLIS, T.; PARKIN, S. (org.). Why writing matters: issues of access and identity in writing research and pedagogy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2009. p. 169-187.
LILLIS, T. Ethnography as Method, Methodology, and “Deep Theorizing”: Closing the Gap Between Text and Context in Academic Writing Research. Written Communication, v. 25, n. 3, p. 352-388, 2008. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0741088308319229. Acesso em: 05 out. 2021.
LILLIS, T.; CURRY, M. J. Academic writing in a global context: the politics and practices of publishing in English. New York: Routledge, 2010.
LILLIS, T.; HARRINGTON, K.; LEA, M. R.; MITCHELL, S. Introduction. In: LILLIS, T.; HARRINGTON, K.; LEA, M. R.; MITCHELL, S. (org.). Working with academic literacies: case studies towards transformative practice. Anderson, South Carolina: Parlor Press; Fort Collins, Colorado: WAC Clearinghouse, 2015. p. 03-22.
NÓBREGA, M. H. Orientandos e Orientadores no século XXI: desafios da pós-graduação. Educação & Realidade, v. 43, n. 3, p. 1055-1076, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/edreal/a/JKQjXW6T4PmtkqCJFN5T9Md/abstract/?lang=pt. Acesso em: 05 out. 2021.
PARIS, L. G. Letramentos acadêmicos de doutorandos: entre mediações e publicações. 2021. Tese (Doutorado em Linguística Aplicada) – Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, 2021. Disponível em: http://acervus.unicamp.br/index.asp?codigo_sophia=1165156. Acesso em: 05 out. 2021.
STILLMAN-WEBB, N. Writing beliefs and mentoring practices: advisor perspectives on post/graduate writing instruction in the Sciences. In: BADENHORST, C.; GUERIN, C. (org.). Research literacies and writing pedagogies for masters and doctoral writers. Leiden: Brill, 2016. p. 257-276.
STREET, B. V. “Hidden” features of academic paper writing. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, v. 24, n. 1, p. 1-17, 2009. Disponível em: https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1203&context=wpel. Acesso em: 05 out. 2021.
STREET, B. V.; LEA, M. R.; LILLIS, T. Revisiting the question of transformation in academic literacies: the ethnographic imperative. In: LILLIS, T.; HARRINGTON, K.; LEA, M. R.; MITCHELL, S. (org.). Working with academic literacies: case studies towards transformative practice. Anderson, South Carolina: Parlor Press; Fort Collins, Colorado: WAC Clearinghouse, 2015. p. 383-390.
WANG, T.; LI, L. Y. ‘Tell me what to do’ vs. ‘guide me through it’: feedback experiences of international doctoral students. Active Learning in Higher Education, v. 12, n. 12, p. 101-112, 2011. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1469787411402438. Acesso em: 05 out. 2021.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista do GEL
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Esta revista oferece acesso livre imediato ao seu conteúdo, seguindo o princípio de que disponibilizar gratuitamente o conhecimento científico ao público proporciona maior democratização mundial do conhecimento.
A REVISTA DO GEL não cobra taxa de submissão ou de editoração de artigos (articles processing charges – APC).
Os critérios gerais de direitos autorais da REVISTA DO GEL estão dispostos no termo de direitos autorais que cada autor aceita ao submeter seu trabalho no periódico. Como regra geral o periódico utiliza as regras CC BY-NC da Creative Commons (regra disponível em: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode)
